From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D0C353858C2C; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 11:08:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D0C353858C2C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1698750528;
	bh=iP5jfNsd1ARKqcAQZvwwHxkoufUsPGpNfICj80/EOpk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=xeJ4sRtDtM3gSBtKXjJf/XDI7He8Q2Ay9hiIwknHT3dOueTlYJbQ68YyrQQxrB9z4
	 4+VZqocS8mYW6yn0CJAZcEQPvfa0NmQCWBBxdl8x41oYMxixSCHynKf1AsRfOsEM/3
	 djF+JZc0zuksu3g8ODXAQU8Oyry2v2EzlSYBrQJo=
From: "zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/112303] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at
 -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_flow_info failed since
 r14-3459-g0c78240fd7d519
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 11:08:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112303-4-nPn958YgEb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112303

--- Comment #5 from Zhendong Su <zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> (In reply to Zhendong Su from comment #0)
> > This appears to be a recent regression.
> >=20
>=20
> Out of interest, when you say this, do you have a rough range in mind? It=
'd
> make bisecting easier. Or do you just mean you surely would've hit it by =
now
> with your testing if it had been there a while?

By "This appears to be a recent regression", I typically mean, according to
Compiler Explorer, the bug is only reproduced with its current trunk build.=