public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/112307] Segmentation fault with -O1 -fcode-hoisting Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 15:05:52 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-112307-4-KvuKu2BPks@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-112307-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112307 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- return EnumeratorRange(Enumerator(std::views::single(Intersection()))); This creates a temporary Intersection object, then copies that into a single_view object. Then that is copied into an Enumerator object which looks like: Enumerator { single_view<Intersection> range_; optional<single_view<Intersection>::_Iterator> begin_; }; The range_ member is the copy of std::views::single(Intersection()) and the begin_ member is initially empty. Then that Enumerator is copied into an EnumeratorRange which calls Next() on the new copy, which sets its begin_ member to point to the range_ member. Then the EnumeratorRange is returned. So I think it's expected that the Enumerator points to itself, because of the call to its Next() member. BUT, the self-referential pointer is set to the address of the range_ member before the return value is copied, and so goes out of scope when that object is copied via registers and then copied again into the automatic variable in main(). So yes, I think it's invalid for the same reason as PR 109945 comment 25 explains, and indeed giving any of the objects a non-trivial destructor prevents it being copied via registers and so the pointer isn't invalidated.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-05 15:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-10-31 9:39 [Bug c++/112307] New: " raffael at casagrande dot ch 2023-10-31 9:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/112307] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-31 10:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-31 10:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-05 11:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-05 15:05 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-03-05 15:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-08 12:58 ` raffael at casagrande dot ch 2024-03-08 14:30 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-08 14:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-08 15:12 ` raffael at casagrande dot ch
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-112307-4-KvuKu2BPks@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).