From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EBA573858C00; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 08:07:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EBA573858C00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1698912446; bh=8SAKjcwr6Apgvf9CipHSzygTp7W+oSSRYMoSnbKIpjc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XfDBAqu7s14n1rJEc0yYoUXP5q569z/qYm5+YiIJ9i+d5iK9ar9346CV2b2nfFpV3 xdQCmKA0mCtvblreFSt4KNXhPJYJyky8q1WN23Ln1OsQUWFOMHccboquz++6oUw5RA ZGxmIxGN4VyP9gtyhnQbBoqvjHR2YKwVZkjMMecg= From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112330] [14 Regression] LoongArch: Bootstrap failure with GAS 2.41 Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 08:07:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure, build X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112330 --- Comment #13 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to chenglulu from comment #12) > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #11) > > I cherry-picked f87cf663af71e5d78c8d647fa48562102f3b0615 for Binutils 2= .41 > > and get some better error message: > >=20 > > t.s:98064: Error: Reloc overflow > > t.s:101127: Error: Reloc overflow > > t.s:101453: Error: Reloc overflow > > t.s:101555: Error: Reloc overflow > >=20 > > t.s is the assembly file in attachments. >=20 > 1fb3cdd87ec61715a5684925fb6d6a6cf53bb97c is also required=EF=BC=8E I know, I'm just trying to understand the issue better. I don't really understand why this was not a problem before r14-4674. And = this issue also did not show up immediately after r14-4674 (it even did not show= up when I was developing r14-4851).=