From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B60203858D20; Wed,  1 Nov 2023 09:07:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B60203858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1698829660;
	bh=I6ICssi3vcbOqYwPBxZvhr2hLhVXgbg0ssUpzeDyW+w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ZH50BIDfTkEq1kLEAzVKRrqhK8fLBh9FzSo2Csu3gzp5y4Sz6WvrvVvBhngwfjA9+
	 thKCVyA0hSYgZ5W57WP5lrH7fRzP0b9OPdiFNbkAIrCVXffa3eCWG+W2XnGeksv8J9
	 BiuOBsowxIrbBVbHXwViScjBRDgBDzy1wB/1w1lk=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/112330] [14 Regression] LoongArch: LTO bootstrap failure
 with GAS 2.41
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2023 09:07:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112330-4-tMTYdsRjm0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112330-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112330-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112330

--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #0)
> >=20
> > > I guess the easiest solution is raising the minimal GAS requirement of
> > > bootstrapping GCC 14 on LoongArch to 2.42.
> >=20
> > Another solution might be default to -mno-relax if GAS is 2.41, but I'm=
 not
> > sure if it's enough.
>=20
> This issue really doesn't happen after adding -mno-relax, but is it really
> necessary to judge the version of binutils because of this?

I'm not sure if -mno-relax is the proper fix.  For now I've reduced the test
case to:

a:
.rept 100000
nop
.endr
beq $r12, $r13, a

but this still does not work with GAS 2.41 even if -mno-relax.=