From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id EB04F3858D37; Thu,  2 Nov 2023 13:03:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EB04F3858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1698930231;
	bh=mgbuiLTwcAx3znicWZlKPdg8fsjKkflBey0cccD6K98=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=xxs8A5Qny4G+TDTu7Dedhaj7e+JJQXwPcvHkzb4j1nWnsw98vsZmRf9f/b1UHE8ee
	 mzS4RgpBtM/lQ9vOoju69uHZVmlRoLRPj/rR0q1Cwq7J/v2rNPnEDNEi2U/BGTLKAI
	 JsTqYVZqkwGWJcxjqkd7GrGVlI18pMjsme5RK5vQ=
From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/112334] ICE in gen_untyped_return arm.md:9197 while
 compiling harden-cfr-bret.c
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 13:03:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112334-4-epVwQl4STq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112334-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112334-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112334

--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This might be a side issue, but:

@defbuiltin{{void} __builtin_return (void *@var{result})}
This built-in function returns the value described by @var{result} from
the containing function.  You should specify, for @var{result}, a value
returned by @code{__builtin_apply}.

So I'm not sure it's legal to pass &i to __builtin_return().=