From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9CCC23858418; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 16:40:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9CCC23858418 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1700671207; bh=j/d5aaD1AHhHDJ//alhReFnJcNZeInyWYJgIh7+Itns=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=id+fxiWACVr8mO0L81NOMCA4CGXprygK11wjZc6O2GQsHwHON+NLHNAtUOiZnR5cC d6WagQ1OA2PuzjM2GsGd+9MVdXK6cNK6fqr1dFCsG000rYUGeDkYDW4Ti6tPKKobzN h2rCD7k29VmzZrphD12Mv/wDQ2u5LJIjpOlnvD3g= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/112336] fsanitize=address vs _BitInt with a non-mode size (smaller than max mode size) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 16:40:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112336 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems one doesn't need the sanitizer for that, unsigned _BitInt(1) v1; unsigned _BitInt(1) *p1 =3D &v1; ICEs as well.=