public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/112351] New: libstdc++ locale init doesn't handle __gthread_once failure
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 15:07:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-112351-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112351

            Bug ID: 112351
           Summary: libstdc++ locale init doesn't handle __gthread_once
                    failure
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.2.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

pthread_once called through gthread_once can return "an error number" but the
locale init code isn't prepared for that, instead leaving the object
uninitialized:

src/c++98/locale.cc:

  __c_locale
  locale::facet::_S_get_c_locale()
  {
#ifdef __GTHREADS
    if (__gthread_active_p())
      __gthread_once(&_S_once, _S_initialize_once);
    else
#endif
      {
        if (!_S_c_locale)
          _S_initialize_once();
      }
    return _S_c_locale;
  }

OTOH similar code exists for C++11 locales which doesn't specifically handle
errors but instead executes the non-threaded fallback code in that case:

src/c++11/locale_init.cc:

  void
  locale::_S_initialize()
  {
#ifdef __GTHREADS
    if (!__gnu_cxx::__is_single_threaded())
      __gthread_once(&_S_once, _S_initialize_once);
#endif
    if (__builtin_expect(!_S_classic, 0))
      _S_initialize_once();
  }

Imagine an application overriding pthread_once (and other thread functions)
with an implementation that "fails" before some intitialization is done
(also imagine, just for curiosity, it wouldn't signal failure but success
and do nothing in that case...).

It would be nice to handle the situation consistently and either do the
single-threaded "fallback" or abort on failure.

             reply	other threads:[~2023-11-02 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-02 15:07 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-11-02 15:48 ` [Bug libstdc++/112351] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-06 10:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-06 10:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-07 12:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-07 12:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-112351-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).