From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5AA783858CDB; Fri,  3 Nov 2023 18:52:37 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5AA783858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1699037557;
	bh=GMx9AEnJdaZD7dbIw/8iNiK6eBMTYSNA1OuV2sSz8NA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tt4UXM90mg5QxkjDqePgt59dcszVGVo9eYS8EYKSEPM/caZpObcoOSHrodVi7c03e
	 JoWjwPIH18qavcu3gEtm+QE8p1hgt58qz4LclIsWWEoZOrmQWBEey1Ca0PCynKl5cJ
	 X5QxJzzPo0yaS90De/PKAy+z4P/FmxX+LJn3Srec=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/112372] GCC omits function location in DWARF at higher
 optimisation levels
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2023 18:52:37 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-debug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112372-4-UaMnWx1I2X@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112372-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112372-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112372

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Giuliano Procida from comment #2)
> The symbols are not aliased (which is what I thought might have happened
> with very aggressive optimisations). If they had been aliased, it would be
> much harder to give the symbols types.

They can't alias for language reasons that is `&y !=3D &x` (and `&x !=3D &z=
`) has
to be true. Anyways as mentioned in PR 65797, a thunk is being created and
going wrong.=20

Yes maybe ICF should not touch empty functions ... But I doubt that was your
original testcase.=