From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 15D5F3858C2A; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 09:55:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 15D5F3858C2A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700128540;
	bh=LN4s4fP2D+RhpBHdig/E8gblrybx3kXQDT5eX3K56Lk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=wtF9HLLVSGiku/jKGTBiAIpD87I8Di/Kl02ZeXmTzzNbUZHTRdkybn18drkrM1EcZ
	 gBVWA5p0WYre92y1esL1etP95pR889+M05o0ng+xj5lSrdhWfv9p0NiwotwnoZi5vS
	 frnAy91yq8ddV/E0bSvSj7hxzoi9gVlDOlYI7GEU=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/112374] [14 Regression] Failed bootstrap with
 `--with-arch=skylake-avx512 --with-cpu=skylake-avx512`, causes a comparison
 failure since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865d5f3bbe93e666183b54ec
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 09:55:39 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, compare-debug-failure
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112374-4-Sm05g1s88K@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112374

--- Comment #45 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #44)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #42)
> > Just one suggestion for the testcases, add:
> > /* { dg-additional-options "-march=3Darmv9-a" { target aarch64*-*-* } }=
 */
> >=20
> > So it at least it will be tested on another target.
>=20
> Does aarch64*-*-* support -march=3Darmv9-a regardless of whether e.g.
> assembler has support for it?  I mean, x86 does that, but I think e.g.
> powerpc didn't or doesn't.

Yes -march=3Darmv9-a is supported even if the assembler does not support it=
.=