From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4C9743858C41; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 11:23:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4C9743858C41 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1699356195; bh=uFG9dJ3HM1A4jmNvAiKnJB1S/Yfol6BUaMsHAErvrBU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IB1kaMPXbWo3onvtMLWfAK3N79eqp47SjZr4xiAYOUkqyMmFH90dO0ca2ZJz6Pcml 1NuS2FnaE3Tas0jZ5fIENh3hDRB2dkZ07DG21cjwO9C8rvV8Gud0wJOr3Fx2c5FrON LlMkCSiXr5cmgmPpAs0MocEzuaXW62G0tcq0M3is= From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/112406] [14 Regression] Several SPECCPU 2017 benchmarks fail with LTO on internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.cc:8305 Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 11:23:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112406 --- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Possibly the same as PR112359? Some were yeah, looks like there are still 2 ICEs in imagick and exchange, = I'll start reducing those.=