From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 73A163858CDA; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 10:29:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 73A163858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700562578;
	bh=7j+bnohHoEiKh7cCY9WbjrG5qCgOvJ1noYij9Y/rXS0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Pbyf0nTu9W2Z13g9IvvsNDwr3k9eVRdbrnTtQQg0S3ByRWMR5mi/d2UPYJHZpztzc
	 M+LlhJUkaQOrby7RQTuSZRdpZTEmDWAMZkoEpjIPkPOBqojcclymMrWcpOz0/8VtbW
	 s7f/WCBRopaGj+iqePk0psWx65UOD8baYc0H7oRc=
From: "rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/112406] [14 Regression] Several SPECCPU 2017
 benchmarks fail with on internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at
 optabs.cc:8305 after g:01c18f58d37865d5f3bbe93e666183b54ec608c7
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 10:29:37 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112406-4-kP7bBnPMCZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112406-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112406-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112406

--- Comment #18 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Already in ifcvt we have:

_ifc__60 =3D .COND_ADD (_2, _6, MADPictureC1_lsm.10_25, MADPictureC1_lsm.10=
_25);

which we should not.  This is similar on riscv.

But during value numbering it still is

Value numbering stmt =3D _ifc__60 =3D .COND_ADD (_47, MADPictureC1_lsm.10_2=
5, _6,
MADPictureC1_lsm.10_25);

so we originally created the right thing.
Hmm, no simplification is happening.  Is there still a swap somewhere that
should not be?=