public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/112406] [14 Regression] Several SPECCPU 2017 benchmarks fail with LTO on internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.cc:8305
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 07:02:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-112406-4-vi3gu7rtKl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-112406-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112406
Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2023-11-08
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No, ICE is still there on imagick and on exchange it's changed to
during GIMPLE pass: vect
exchange2.fppized.f90: In function 'digits_2.isra':
exchange2.fppized.f90:998:31: internal compiler error: in
vect_get_vec_defs_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:1257
998 | recursive subroutine digits_2(row)
| ^
0x1813b6b vect_get_vec_defs_for_operand(vec_info*, _stmt_vec_info*, unsigned
int, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_heap, vl_ptr>*, tree_node*)
/opt/buildAgent/work/5c94c4ced6ebfcd0/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc:1257
0x1813ceb vect_get_vec_defs(vec_info*, _stmt_vec_info*, _slp_tree*, unsigned
int, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_heap, vl_ptr>*, tree_node*, tree_node*,
vec<tree_node*, va_heap, vl_ptr>*, tree_node*, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*,
va_heap, vl_ptr>*, tree_node*, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_heap, vl_ptr>*,
tree_node*)
/opt/buildAgent/work/5c94c4ced6ebfcd0/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc:1289
0x1813dcf vect_get_vec_defs(vec_info*, _stmt_vec_info*, _slp_tree*, unsigned
int, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_heap, vl_ptr>*, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*,
va_heap, vl_ptr>*, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_heap, vl_ptr>*, tree_node*,
vec<tree_node*, va_heap, vl_ptr>*)
/opt/buildAgent/work/5c94c4ced6ebfcd0/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc:1311
0xea9bc3 vect_transform_reduction(_loop_vec_info*, _stmt_vec_info*,
gimple_stmt_iterator*, gimple**, _slp_tree*)
/opt/buildAgent/work/5c94c4ced6ebfcd0/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc:8470
0x18311fb vect_transform_stmt(vec_info*, _stmt_vec_info*,
gimple_stmt_iterator*, _slp_tree*, _slp_instance*)
/opt/buildAgent/work/5c94c4ced6ebfcd0/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc:13100
0xe9a223 vect_transform_loop_stmt
/opt/buildAgent/work/5c94c4ced6ebfcd0/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc:11322
0xeb79ff vect_transform_loop(_loop_vec_info*, gimple*)
/opt/buildAgent/work/5c94c4ced6ebfcd0/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc:11774
0xeedb4b vect_transform_loops
/opt/buildAgent/work/5c94c4ced6ebfcd0/gcc/tree-vectorizer.cc:1006
0xeee18f try_vectorize_loop_1
/opt/buildAgent/work/5c94c4ced6ebfcd0/gcc/tree-vectorizer.cc:1152
0xeee18f try_vectorize_loop
/opt/buildAgent/work/5c94c4ced6ebfcd0/gcc/tree-vectorizer.cc:1182
0xeee40f execute
/opt/buildAgent/work/5c94c4ced6ebfcd0/gcc/tree-vectorizer.cc:1298
I'll reduce exchange first since less object files.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-08 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-06 11:20 [Bug middle-end/112406] New: [14 Regression] Several SPECCPU 2017 benchmarks fail with " tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-06 13:11 ` [Bug middle-end/112406] [14 Regression] Several SPECCPU 2017 benchmarks fail with LTO on " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-07 11:23 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-07 21:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-08 7:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-08 7:02 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-11-08 10:24 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-08 10:25 ` [Bug middle-end/112406] [14 Regression] Several SPECCPU 2017 benchmarks fail with on internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.cc:8305 after g:01c18f58d37865d5f3bbe93e666183b54ec608c7 tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-08 10:40 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-08 11:06 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-08 11:24 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-08 15:50 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-08 15:54 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-17 20:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-20 9:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-21 4:45 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-21 7:38 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-21 9:07 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-21 9:33 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-21 10:29 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-21 10:51 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-21 11:22 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-21 11:40 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-21 20:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-23 12:08 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-02 19:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-03 19:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-112406-4-vi3gu7rtKl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).