From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E0C393858D38; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 07:27:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E0C393858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711783631;
	bh=eqU14Ytsx5hvdMi33ISYWjeogt23XsKS0b9kYaBynKY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=jPhZxBzCnCg+TWtTc1TLVPyNM4MuGOoEAeZgTkqEuuQoqznDUTgnLxbV9236sJkwc
	 7qb41BxrF3RK5rw1Akd1/rAYNnHOy0ws4MNdwq3a+G0UIgQ5CtM+pPsvGV+6V7lgAI
	 FyvKxPCLYQvchDHqU1uMsYxLfB5gUjBxcKFJdlMw=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/112407] [13/14 Regression] Fix for PR37336 triggers an
 ICE in gfc_format_decoder while constructing a vtab
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 07:27:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112407-4-1S5Go3Ahcc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112407-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112407-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112407

--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #8)
> Created attachment 57835 [details]
> An alternative fix for the PR
>=20
> Hi Tomas,
>=20
> Would you prefer the compiler to give warning rather than letting the
> possible recursion to pass by silently?
>=20
> f951: Warning: Non-RECURSIVE procedure =E2=80=98newcopyother=E2=80=99 fro=
m module
> =E2=80=98ftldynarrayintmodule=E2=80=99 is  possibly calling itself recurs=
ively in procedure
> =E2=80=98newcopyother=E2=80=99.  Declare it RECURSIVE or use =E2=80=98-fr=
ecursive=E2=80=99
>=20
> Cheers
>=20
> Paul

After reflection, I have answered the question myself. The other part of the
patch in resolve.cc should ensure that the recursion is detected in the mod=
ule
compilation.

Paul=