From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4A8E43889803; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 11:02:37 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4A8E43889803 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1699354957; bh=9FhmdTcPZdHKnX6Akkli1jXkL9Okl0MkNBWDTEc3jC8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=muDI/1Ur1TAVPGRQdqyAu6Nxe1RboM54C0jNUKvKuvbfcxsM3SgAWLy15uv8yXihA /UAt1iFODvKEdbX7nZyO4uNeI5V9jS0ohMj1lp+73xmEhXxafAIHUMUjReivExq0Gb KnEKoeRpw88Yp0aHCW2NiUl8t7NOoTqkv1m4DA/M= From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112411] ICE: SIGSEGV with --param=min-nondebug-insn-uid=2147483647 on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 11:02:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112411 --- Comment #3 from Richard Sandiford --- This parameter is firmly into =E2=80=9Cdeveloper only=E2=80=9D territory, s= o I'm not sure we should try to enforce a range. IMO we should just recommend that the param= eter isn't included in fuzz testing.=