From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9AD9A3858D32; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 04:28:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9AD9A3858D32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1700108888; bh=k25ZYooKHLKJu1M40a4pH7LlfBRg+NDJfihmznn5kug=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hdHME2ya8pgkeg0/9yqAeGvMhBQ62iy1V4JdNaRK7eURKKMJ9OhS+9LYOhbcfKD43 sDvzaxE4gexvw/0452gu/fOV4uFkss+RKrYrc16tckJVHeK4K2HqZF9L3erfC8HnxW py5KHJh1yU2gMypNEstgzQ7SoOU6g/TdyQ24X018= From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/112419] [14 Regression] gcc.dg/Wnonnull-4.c excess error for 32-bit targets Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 04:28:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, patch, testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords assigned_to bug_file_loc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112419 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch Assignee|uecker at gcc dot gnu.org |hp at gcc dot gnu.o= rg URL| |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma | |il/gcc-patches/2023-Novembe | |r/636717.html --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to uecker from comment #1) > Confirmed. I think adding -Wstringop-overflow=3D to the test might fix it= . It > is just some test which is wrong for 32 bit targets and somehow this > problems appeared now due to an unrelated change. >=20 > I will try this and submit a patch. I guess you got side-tracked. I posted a patch hence taking the PR.=