From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5B77A3858418; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:49:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5B77A3858418 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710852541; bh=wF7n1qhmzqJw7Yji287+FhkadLTss+B2klc+LwQqG3s=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WEXPn9JaDU0m4fDSOFKhzpuNEtJXghOi+L/6S5jQv2tCMYZIQp9AQ557bkSv2RVlm A2UG+GuU0QT1vmAK0GrMxC1vZzq5AlaGf/oFovWFcSAesyx03iqugv+41HiVXD0jRw 9F+Fl8t8imoa0ABh8PhDWYZ1Hzy/6rC5Uulds8OQ= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112470] [11/12/13/14 regression] [AARCH64] stack-protector vulnerability fixing solution impact code size and performance Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:49:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112470 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, is there anything we should do about this PR, or just close it as neces= sary outcome of trying to be more secure when user asked for it?=