From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DAD4438582B7; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 22:28:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DAD4438582B7
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1699655316;
	bh=1j2tFETZfli+7Mw7b/057NRLwS/B70KNBaYUkrk/UG8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=X63Sdhx3UvRJJFuyFeoXPjMAEp1nLRJ+DwYl+QOL6GX99tqo+3Ch8RWpCKyPHxIg3
	 xCZrlq1iaSv+YQineGcU+MTdLacsat6MM/87GFMvuMlxQFYaN8HezF8fk182XGxZdq
	 KkCyZx4NWO2IxjnYhzeIuDMQRgMsPqHLq5y7GZMk=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/112470] [11/12/13/14 regression] [AARCH64]
 stack-protector vulnerability fixing solution impact code size and
 performance
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 22:28:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity priority keywords target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-112470-4-yHZ36xuLQ8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112470-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112470-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112470

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |critical
           Priority|P3                          |P1
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
   Target Milestone|---                         |11.5

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> This is I suppose a 11/12/13/14 regression (if valid) given we backported=
 it
> all the way down.

P1 because it was not in releases before hand too.=