From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B33723858C41; Sun, 12 Nov 2023 19:25:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B33723858C41 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1699817135; bh=xdGAGcT6adAhEgyWRhJcbmyOt1ARsfOOkaUr+tOi6Yc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RU/AP1jqE6nJOaT3gqV2yhk2kZ67OQ/WiXZ1kdQVE7p1sd4CyXetgmiAc818KoDmO 4dVwqPFWRNCd0YsoZ5WzEb5EDWaUqCsbHQXkNay9cQPMzIg4xILHgsCkiWuB3qg4AF JVpC3zXy1y3eNcN5uqV/B1cHg1VVm7VSCZ/nW+tc= From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/112483] [14 Regression] gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_2.f90 fails on loongarch64-linux-gnu at -O1 or above Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 19:25:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112483 Tamar Christina changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina --- Yeah, that fold-rtx code is bogus. It's a latent bug. Optimizing copysign(x, -y) to neg(x) is just wrong. Will you be sending a patch Xi or do you want me to?=