From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 089A53858D28; Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:42:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 089A53858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1699774946;
	bh=/DeN+b0aRe8vHu0gINfE9xIn6AY7El5OM4U6+hY3Br4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mltliM9aeeMOcL0ISmTd26+dXEzbOgeX9O4Lc+Y5H6UVKWj+gQrHP09FTnblcA3z3
	 cMxwqGXALhqN6yGZyPiCeHl3X0mSJDT7C2/rzWihw0qQmITQfWFxL74W26srNsIP+M
	 LoiQOQIBSOE/UwYsYSR2DpGis/xmpqX0IFqQgeEk=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/112485] datestamp on -v recently broken ?
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:42:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112485-4-QlJHychoWo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112485

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gccadmin/2023q4/020594.html=