From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 76D3B3858D34; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 06:34:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 76D3B3858D34 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1713076466; bh=yF8T36/wG/fhYnj15gllkMeO2FZ/B/6c6GsBew3sepQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LDi7WhwMnHlx4kS7sIEaOOynt1JgqcVbvQXmj6+LzyDlfd3g1AQHUYWcxFh9wFKTh iKJ98HYz8uk7PrOBZwlAU7L4tosjRN2Sqo024v+VY3T5JSrgAd89iTnI0KjwPvKLlx oR+L+rK68hjPN4AsrK29qrya2GK7EVXKSmBOjPzI= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/112493] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest with scalar_storage_order Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 06:34:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112493 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- gcc_assert (reverse =3D=3D access->reverse); Oh the verification was added with r10-6320-g5b9e89c922dc2e . So there is no reason to do a bisect either. Lucky this is with checking enabled so most f= olks are not running into this.=