From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AD02D3858C42; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 19:51:29 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AD02D3858C42 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1700077889; bh=+nv6keKIlqTtSxnT8v4HSFeByWocCdggVIWB++bc3fk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hx7oyUWM2iuPEnN1S1x2x5qERMrXh+EtXzaDxHte9MmkOxE1v4LOAXq0R3DYMinMS wB5iTLpb2VxqNK8yz0nRuLbuHi7qt+KlGfVNZkSwcF7QxLChJ8XTMwgniXfeIpoDL+ ElJGPPF2clcb9c5Navg2p3lFNvn1mcMVmBSKD0KM= From: "rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112531] [14] RISC-V: gcc.dg/unroll-8.c rtl-dump scan errors with --param=riscv-autovec-preference=scalable Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 19:51:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112531 --- Comment #4 from Robin Dapp --- Personally, I don't mind having some FAILs as long as we know them and understand the reason for them. I wouldn't insist on "fixing" them but do= n't mind if others prefer to have the results "clean". Probably a matter of ta= ste.=