From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5B423385840C; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:03:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5B423385840C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710248586; bh=fTf0eIhFjopgBaIwQYx5p5fCdklo+/jwRx0oMWSbrKU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Zb0iusa6vojBB0B1EX4IJxEr6HMAJxow3NLjWd/7xeTdoCGgeFJvdXj2m8Cacd4Dq rX+o2UYIucsWZn0kIOm+GERDGpRdsZoyKJY3vfQ4TSxd3dXVa/k7IhLtxAYKElmne/ 9y5+0zh4Etp88Q4LAFtbC0oeGyNS6351GaA7pg+c= From: "pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:03:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112548 --- Comment #8 from Filip Kastl --- (In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #7) > I built executables with and without the commit (-Ofast -march=3Dznver4 > -flto). There is no difference so it must really be something that happe= ns > with PGO. > I'd really need access to a zen4 box or the pgo executables at least. I'd like to help but I'm afraid I cannot send you the SPEC binaries with PGO applied since SPEC is licensed nor can I give you access to a Zen4 computer= . I suppose someone else will have to analyze this bug.=