From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 080543858416; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 09:49:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 080543858416
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710496195;
	bh=ne90CgNlLD5OrK2vp3X33S+j+IWKQEK2F3lH5WJdi40=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ppi6oMvHPFjjs9SFISemMZsOIZ5B1nhZYrjv82AdH9eWI/opmYwSMSxNYNyXfTsYa
	 DNyqcH1qCaNYpOEuN1o2/2oitVIjCXlodDpGL/Imuw9jSsQlil91TjBzontJypuAHH
	 +HHN3vy429uWuymxAJrPqR+ykfHVNI9I98odl8qg=
From: "rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in
 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 09:49:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112548-4-amfLSbMMD3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112548-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112548-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112548

--- Comment #27 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Can you try it with a simpler (non SPEC) test?  Maybe there is still someth=
ing
weird happening with SPEC's scripting.=