public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/112572] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled since r14-5355-g3cd3a09b3f91a1
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2023 09:42:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-112572-4-Qk1JUcKh7e@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-112572-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112572
--- Comment #27 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #18)
> This fixes the issue for me:
> ```
> diff --git a/gcc/compare-elim.cc b/gcc/compare-elim.cc
> [...]
This solves both pipewire (unreported, was working on reducing it; found it
needed -fstack-protector-strong and I think PIE) and LLVM failures. Thank you
Andrew & thanks Sergei for looking at it too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112613#c3 is an interesting
comment wrt checking. Is that feasible?
It would be nice if this was catchable with --enable-checking=rtl or
--enable-checking=df (I don't test with this regularly, but it would've been
helpful after seeing the bisect result), especially given there's some clear
(possible) misuse.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-19 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-16 20:06 [Bug middle-end/112572] New: " sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-17 0:00 ` [Bug middle-end/112572] " sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-17 0:41 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-17 4:13 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-17 4:14 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-17 5:21 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-17 5:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-17 5:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-17 10:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 10:18 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 10:19 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 10:23 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 10:58 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 10:59 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 11:00 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 11:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 11:36 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 21:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 21:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 21:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 21:38 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 21:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 22:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 22:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 23:06 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-18 23:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-19 7:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-19 9:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-19 9:42 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-11-30 21:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-30 21:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-30 22:29 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-04 2:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-04 11:01 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-06 9:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-06 18:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-112572-4-Qk1JUcKh7e@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).