From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 494E7385734F; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:12:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 494E7385734F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1701378770; bh=Ntjz8C9lOvmBSr/fUN3vSnCwK71OjkJWNsqKjbRybF0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=g6OydcXPhBqGA9L/oyFRypS6SHVR+TTfyLOqNZgy3bImpg/kQF8QYjBeDm4nPd80W xc4MvJKxaLZmWTlNIfgwy+La5f9vvIDKE+XkAIMfInA2MUg4lEWbTxdwFEYNufXpOj atsCCh3eN7mT/qhJI18BI6LoCyXP1BS6w3ZjQPTM= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/112572] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled since r14-5355-g3cd3a09b3f91a1 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:12:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112572 --- Comment #29 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #28) > So, what is the state here? Andrew, are you going to post the #c18 patch? > Do we have a reduced testcase? I was hoping someone else would take over since there seems to be a disagreement of if the bug is in compare-elim or in postreload pass. As far as a reduced testcase, I don't think we have one.=