From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2F0EC3858D33; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 23:04:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2F0EC3858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700262258;
	bh=XV70Nx1c3pEgvuuYWfgwzpbxNIwFULrO92L5JOSrG/w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=XuMBO3RSC9jP55gTRNn+60OKIESgded/2F+BoJYgiNHSrenJv5bjGkfor/rCytFlM
	 3ynMaAeCFqaLW5qHwxwXs1wHQR8BYP27hOl9ORhZVGruiBAHyn+YPL7wPUdn7msYaV
	 tWBxf5tqUTE5G9unJU58rSOHcithbeaZOOSgmER8=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/112581] [14 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on
 x86_64-linux-gnu (generated code hangs) since r14-4661
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 23:04:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112581-4-atd4VSr9yc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112581-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112581-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112581

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
forwprop3 does:
```
  _12 =3D ~iftmp.7_30;
  h_40 =3D (unsigned int) _12;
...
  if (h_40 =3D=3D 4294967295)
```

into:
```
  _75 =3D (unsigned int) iftmp.7_30;
  if (iftmp.7_30 =3D=3D 0)
```

Which as far as I can tell is correct.

And then reassociate2 combines:
```
  <bb 18> [local count: 57431765]:
  if (iftmp.7_30 =3D=3D 0)
    goto <bb 19>; [97.17%]
  else
    goto <bb 20>; [2.83%]

  <bb 19> [local count: 55807730]:
  if (i_27 !=3D 0)
    goto <bb 20>; [100.00%]
  else
    goto <bb 17>; [0.00%]
```
into:
```
  <bb 18> [local count: 57431765]:
  _75 =3D iftmp.7_30 | i_27;
  _33 =3D _75 =3D=3D 0;
  if (_33 !=3D 0)
    goto <bb 17>; [97.17%]
  else
    goto <bb 19>; [2.83%]
```

or
```
if ((_30 =3D=3D 0) & (i_27 =3D=3D 0)) goto <17> else goto <19/20>
```
Which looks correct.
I don't see anything going wrong with the patch itself ...=