From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1BA383858298; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 23:45:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1BA383858298 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1700523926; bh=iNQNdt4rJ73Lv/xZLV7GF56bIR5Tdg2tyM8zRjbN3Tc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lCgXf8OMmK5CE1aiO3T7mhZEMhginKiog2DCy917P6IE9KdTW8J71WNcJeKp5Ohmk +VwbD/G0AZ5OgDh/kN9WyPg+bG4O31tt3rgh72l4639J7rlK67Q9u9CpeYstnvRM4o G3BiWtEENGANt5SO4BgYXBh13xDGUUfWfYvlj/hU= From: "patrick at rivosinc dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 23:45:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: patrick at rivosinc dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112583 --- Comment #5 from Patrick O'Neill --- I built all the zvl variants as a multilib. It seems like that caused them = to interfere with eachother (potentially picking up the wrong glibc?). I'll re= run with separate runs & update the issues with updated logs once it's done. Thanks for catching this!=