From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B552C385772E; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:44:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B552C385772E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1700750680; bh=ztxQv4TMtKOUue0SaROgLJ2tDpcM6xIXR+Ka5dXazdY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VW/BMnmAyL6DqWrbHE6YQHldXuxhe54/IQJtyps3szHKUKF0kvAOlZV+xHYLXg5ZQ NigZDW3sT7qQ/mkohkIiMT+IunQCRvUP9Xb5UMMnux00VdCjvk7d00Xy26uCbDTour MAfHNoNuHOVdcnBs2SE+BR4y7kPY9p3H1zGoQjS0= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/112593] FAIL: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/equivalent_functions.cc on Solaris Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:44:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112593 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2023-11-23 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #1) > The test also FAILs on Solaris 11.4, both sparc and x86, 32 and 64-bit.=20 > However, > the failure mode is different: >=20 > /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/ > cmath/equivalent_functions.cc:120: void test_float_overload(): Assertion > 'std::asin(x) =3D=3D std::asinf(x)' failed. That looks like a similar problem though. std::asin(float) probably calls std::__asinf, which apparently gives a different result to ::asinf. If you comment out the call to test_float_overload() in main, it might fail= at the same place in test_long_double_overload (or maybe somewhere else!) > I wouldn't worry too much about the 11.3 failure (if it's 11.3-only): 11.3 > support is deprecated and was supported to be removed from trunk before t= he > GCC 14 release. However, I've held off from the actual removal until new > sparc and x86 Solaris 11.4 cfarm systems are in place. Yeah, the cfarm is the only way I can test on Solaris, so that's why I use = 11.3 with -enable-obsolete.=