From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 796093858C78; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 11:09:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 796093858C78 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1700651398; bh=Oz5EzYv2fIIYyJLPcbn4oW/um6/bEJvDq00VXxuk2KA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jmFK3ABYUXa/G4oXTRCjM2hWoKjQLO4kLzsN2eKCwruXgm913iTQonSahiq5G7Dzx Ovb1X/h01EK77DIx53ToqlHZ8+Sna3i97gE2SCpC55kYkhXmxzTG423GnV5pozr8i9 rBifih8PaX1v3puhZUnY1RP4IiWce5dsKMba9PQ4= From: "juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112598] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl512b Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 11:09:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112598 --- Comment #6 from JuzheZhong --- Hi, there are these following run FAILs left on RV32/RV64 C/C++: after this patch fix: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/637753.html FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects execution test This case I don't have a quick solution, so file a PR here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112670 This FAIL may need Robin's help. Another FAIL is=20 FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr58955-2.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test Li Pan from intel will handle this FAIL. So I am gonna move on zvl1024b. Btw, could you run zvl2048b, zvl4096b (We can only allow VLEN at most 4096b= it for now) ? I didn't see a PR for these 2. Thanks.=