From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4CECC3858D1E; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:05:16 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4CECC3858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700316316;
	bh=78LDtqLlk+MqwT51UUB3REv0lpgSc3BmOK9mfjoU/Hk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=eNgJhywkqKapPAsMpIzD06siK8wx9i66/7EoeHnjY7CbEx5mT5YzkF+gzHAbsm0pU
	 JJrF7viS/eWCxGCvR5cuGlGonyXZ6gSknZ2tpXNJ5z22NthY+XCAYR/1xoXBTK0drR
	 caRme9UlM6X63e5dbnPtlZa5PeQfIDntYrqEJMUQ=
From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/112606] [14 Regression] powerpc64le-linux-gnu:
 'FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/p8vector-fp.c scan-assembler xsnabsdp'
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:05:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-112606-4-IFNNyuHWEl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112606-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112606-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112606

Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This looks like a target bug. You seem to have an fneg (fabs (..)) instruct=
ion
on powerpc.  This means your copysign pattern needs to either reject the
copysign expansion when the second operand is negative, or it needs to emit
xsnabsdp in this case rather than copysign.

The generic optimization is correct and is doing what the target has reques=
ted,
your copysign optab implementation says you prefer it over for any operand.=