public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gandalf at winds dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/112615] New: gcc incorrectly assumes char *x[2]={"str1", "str2"} has 16-byte minimum alignment and generates SSE instructions (e.g. movaps) when accessing this data
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2023 01:23:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-112615-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112615

            Bug ID: 112615
           Summary: gcc incorrectly assumes char *x[2]={"str1", "str2"}
                    has 16-byte minimum alignment and generates SSE
                    instructions (e.g. movaps) when accessing this data
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: gandalf at winds dot org
  Target Milestone: ---

I ran into the following problem while trying to get Oracle 21c to run on
Gentoo OS under glibc-2.38 and GCC 13.2 on x86-64 with SSE instructions
enabled.

glibc-2.38's time/tzset.c file (see
https://github.com/bminor/glibc/blob/master/time/tzset.c) has the following
non-static declaration on line 31:

char *__tzname[2] = { (char *) "GMT", (char *) "GMT" };

GCC wrongly assumes that this variable __tzname has a minimum alignment of 16
bytes instead of 8. GCC thus generates the following assembly instructions for
this portion of __tzset_parse_tz() when compiling with -march=x86-64:

327       /* Get the standard time zone abbreviations.  */
328       if (parse_tzname (&tz, 0) && parse_offset (&tz, 0))
   0x0000000000000a6f <+63>:    movups %xmm0,0x0(%rip)        # 0xa76
<__tzset_parse_tz+70>
   0x0000000000000a76 <+70>:    movups %xmm0,0x0(%rip)        # 0xa7d
<__tzset_parse_tz+77>
   0x0000000000000a7d <+77>:    movups %xmm0,0x0(%rip)        # 0xa84
<__tzset_parse_tz+84>
   0x0000000000000a84 <+84>:    movups %xmm0,0x0(%rip)        # 0xa8b
<__tzset_parse_tz+91>
   0x0000000000000a8b <+91>:    call   0x440 <parse_tzname>
   0x0000000000000a90 <+96>:    test   %al,%al
   0x0000000000000a92 <+98>:    jne    0xac8 <__tzset_parse_tz+152>
   0x0000000000000a94 <+100>:   movq   0x0(%rip),%xmm0        # 0xa9c
<__tzset_parse_tz+108>

132       __tzname[1] = (char *) tz_rules[1].name;
   0x0000000000000a9c <+108>:   xor    %eax,%eax
   0x0000000000000a9e <+110>:   xor    %edx,%edx
   0x0000000000000aa0 <+112>:   pinsrq $0x1,0x0(%rip),%xmm0        # 0xaab
<__tzset_parse_tz+123>

129       __daylight = tz_rules[0].offset != tz_rules[1].offset;
   0x0000000000000aab <+123>:   mov    %edx,0x0(%rip)        # 0xab1
<__tzset_parse_tz+129>

130       __timezone = -tz_rules[0].offset;
   0x0000000000000ab1 <+129>:   mov    %rax,0x0(%rip)        # 0xab8
<__tzset_parse_tz+136>

131       __tzname[0] = (char *) tz_rules[0].name;
132       __tzname[1] = (char *) tz_rules[1].name;
   0x0000000000000ab8 <+136>:   movaps %xmm0,0x0(%rip)        # 0xabf
<__tzset_parse_tz+143>

In the above, line 131 and 132 are combined into a "movaps" instruction that
requires 16-byte alignment to work properly. However, if a C program is
compiled with a variable called __tzname that is not 16-byte aligned (due to
the fact that char* only requires 8-byte alignment), and this is then linked to
glibc (causing the locally defined __tzname to override the one declared in
glibc), and the if(parse_tzname()) check on line 328 fails due to an invalid TZ
environment variable setting (such as is the case when using Oracle 21c on
Gentoo), the movaps instruction above causes a segmentation fault. Here is an
example test.c C program:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <time.h>

/* Specifically align __tzname to a non-16-byte boundary */
__attribute__((aligned(8))) char *__tzname[2]={"GMT", "GMT"};

char *x="xx";  // This is here to take up the first 8 bytes in .data

int main()
{
  struct tm tm={};
  printf("%ld\n", mktime(&tm));
  return 0;
}

$ gcc -O3 -march=x86-64 test.c -o test -Wall -ggdb3
$ nm test | grep __tzname
0000000000404028 D __tzname
$ ./test
-2209057200
$ TZ=xx ./test
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Removing the __attribute__((aligned(8))) from the test.c program, as follows,
causes the following change:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <time.h>

/* GCC now aligns __tzname to 16 bytes */
char *__tzname[2]={"GMT", "GMT"};
char *x="xx";

int main()
{
  struct tm tm={};
  printf("%ld\n", mktime(&tm));
  return 0;
}

$ gcc -O3 -march=x86-64 test.c -o test -Wall -ggdb3
$ nm test | grep __tzname
0000000000404030 D __tzname
$ ./test
-2209057200
$ TZ=xx ./test
-2209057200

In the examples above, the "x" variable is used to consume 8 bytes in .data, so
that the next available address for "__tzname" is 0x404028.

Assuming a minimum alignment of 16 for __tzname only makes sense when you're
either compiling the whole program or when __tzname is static, but GCC should
not do this when the variable is non-static (as is the case when tzset.o is
compiled inside the glibc source package).

I should clarify that optimizing the variable's address to use 16-byte
alignment can be ideal for data storage vs cache-line boundaries and so this
optimization should likely remain. But the instructions acting on this data
area must assume an 8-byte minimum alignment here, not 16.

             reply	other threads:[~2023-11-19  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-19  1:23 gandalf at winds dot org [this message]
2023-11-19  1:48 ` [Bug target/112615] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-19  1:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-19  2:12 ` gandalf at winds dot org
2023-11-19  2:15 ` gandalf at winds dot org
2023-11-19  2:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-112615-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).