From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BABDD385801D; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 15:37:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BABDD385801D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704469040; bh=jcwLkbU/668ByUtX89MwmaZtmUl8KR0SwrzrgVhH9kY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Zc89vviM7yHPZAmt19kOurxl3XJV3Wn5rzJfwYI6lih8NLqyHc79n0R7tWYogiEdr zGpdrEspAK+KjiKdNZbDoYwwnomWAG9buCV6eVoBLcVG99vkQfIgeftiXQA4Vut8YF 2G1PzIKRaPg0pw+x6Cy78/8JLP03SM2+OXjXmLjU= From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/112616] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu since r10-3311 Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 15:37:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112616 Martin Jambor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot = gnu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > This is like PR 108007 but unlike that one, -fno-tree-dce is not used. But the patch fixes it, so I gess it's time to make it pass ppc64le bootstr= ap. (But I did not want to backport that patch, I wonder whether we can't figure out something simpler :-/ )=