From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 608EB384F9B9; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 09:05:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 608EB384F9B9
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700816749;
	bh=hps/xCSdJfhyeH3pat011MtVFGRJPAJ/d3nuLFypqtA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BcvAFk2oTqDXUrnkCbh5r/OcCz39ZVcOLV8MS5KaY/+SYlq4UmXxX8se2niCM4//E
	 sL1RACDlOcaQQPuszL7QcryNNMIo0GY4T/RZGo8FUU34sNa3orgZ2msQE0dcnPm/Hv
	 xY5LU2QCu+BvcmTYMpJJrezd7ZKjgDTYx9twV8FQ=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/112652] g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C FAILs
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 09:05:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-112652-4-kz2wAFsPZP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112652-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112652-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112652

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Given that C++ says e.g. in https://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#3.1
that program is ill-formed if some character lacks encoding in the execution
character set, I'm afraid the Solaris iconv behavior results in violation of
the C++ standard requirements, it is hard to argue that in the Solaris case
e.g. ISO-8859-1 execution charset would be some special character set where=
 ?
character represents all Unicode characters which don't have a representati=
on
in the character set in addition to ?.
I'm afraid we don't want to maintain iconv replacement inside of libcpp tho=
ugh.=