From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0ECDC3857832; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 22:37:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0ECDC3857832
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700606240;
	bh=V76bC+HHtp2fRLJcdMBjcZhB1Xdm8YagH0kQFs7nlJM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=gF7lBcekhLv2zGcg3782cYl2wKO9T1XKfHhuLVqx0VHYWfeoMVY5fCt6O9vTGBkMW
	 M2auGz92Fcpb2HZyOoufsW4OAiQZQQrtiCW4m4e7gCaq7H5xiqd5YWG4vmUuDLLk8h
	 dObMef8Li92TmW+qqWtVvaE8sea35ceFb8pmoGrU=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/112658] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE: finish_expr_stmt with
 casting an temp array to pointer and constructor call
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 22:37:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also
Message-ID: <bug-112658-4-amcP9ZQWHv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112658-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112658-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112658

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94264

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Hmm GCC rejects:
> ```
> struct foo{
>   foo(const int *new_mac);
> };
> typedef int t[1];
>=20
> void g(){
>   foo f(t{ 0xFC});
> }
> ```
> While clang, MSVC all accepts it ...

Oh wait that is PR 94264.=