From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4CF4D385842C; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 14:56:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4CF4D385842C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700664967;
	bh=VDRJ9SoCPQKVK1H4NMFIQJnrc5T7IaZCviqM2sNYMrw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=uwy85KCCj362lSEWRzpDxFfFbchpelBLQ7ASpsfJesIXT1Nk0MQf8i80jofJeFYfY
	 JTeaVmbe1LvRN9yceyDvVqAp4DC79PJWhtRDKV00QhqPlDj013Uh3XfvMEf3JS7+7Y
	 4ix8QLBZVtG0UrvM5IcQUumCHkGwVVKd5wOFf6EE=
From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/112661] [14] RISC-V ICE: in
 duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025 with maxval_char_3.f90
 vlen256b since r14-5101-g60034ecf25597b
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 14:56:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112661-4-toJss0T5wY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112661

--- Comment #10 from Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> So do we expect - independed of whether a constant/external is used as ma=
sk
> - that uniform constants/externals are generatable and thus we can elide =
the
> check for those?  Possibly also go a different path during code-generation
> then?  (because that will otherwise assert)
Yeah, I think so.  At the time, I don't think there were any cases where
treating uniform values differently would have helped, and it wasn't
trivial thing to test on the fly.  But now we have a reason to try :)=