From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DBE843858D33; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 00:56:47 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DBE843858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700614607;
	bh=Zty+W2XZ64wkxlXSSjsw0Ft5fsmBE9mb8gIV56oU8DA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=TDSZzAFwthgjd+4MCRStP7ihYDwnvUQ+WnydrvZ9C8q9Z5wxGqlr2AfblCYZVD7ap
	 fyxxuQhLgj71411NfKNWB7rVRZMlAHjCoETY5cVW4O/OrI6yFnQGUO/aW6ex/hWY0t
	 KpGTfKhhr8KcftC7qLCisnyWTL+Z1YKmuxl1MpKY=
From: "goon.pri.low at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/112664] missed-optimization: extra comparison when
 reordering statements
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 00:56:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: goon.pri.low at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112664-4-Z8u6MVVRns@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112664-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112664-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112664

--- Comment #4 from gooncreeper <goon.pri.low at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Dup.
>=20
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105496 ***

Apologies.
Though, how are you so good at finding duplicates? What's the secret?(In re=
ply
to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to gooncreeper from comment #2)
> > Though, how are you so good at finding duplicates? What's the secret?
>=20
> Everyone says I have bugzilla memorized but I don't, I am just really code
> at doing keyword searches and knowing what keywords to search for. In this
> case I searched for "canonical compare" because I knew this was a
> canonicalization issue with how GCC changed `v < 6` into `v <=3D 5`

Ah, if I knew the fancy names of optimizations I would probably be a bit be=
tter
at checking my finds.=