From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4E32E3858C78; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:00:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4E32E3858C78
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700665250;
	bh=6v1Qf0BWo5q6O+w1cqK/0NTz+bcENLkIwFn0F7QCGlg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=uzqdM4xyeFI/TCqAQhfDWZRRo8Wt9R/DOQkFY+kx7IGsilqSBKkLlcr03AR3abq+D
	 R1Vl3eqtHtLZdWdeb4Sv+RX3CUVtrDTUajcdzYzacmk95Exj9ClMbsCRjgZ6bpkxJl
	 ORHmexNbi2GizpvE5xEzt1vZ3EbyamGc+nIt56co=
From: "arsen at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/112671] libiconv support lacks separate
 --with-libiconv-{include,lib}
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:00:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112671-4-mMKP75gwl9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112671-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112671-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112671

--- Comment #3 from Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
hm, actually, I think I confused reports - sorry.

do you know if this worked a short while ago?  and if so, how did such a
configuration look?=