From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CDE34385840F; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:35:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CDE34385840F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700832930;
	bh=D3DgmlZ7imcyr7hfO1V9SZusTegLISpUDKj9IymtLIM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=x+H0XUB54+SqHKt+0MQxaOQ69pNMhTBdJtSg/RA3ywRFs8WJ+QT+nJxTfIwLuCn8M
	 y8mbmvGYniWiJChqSndCdXTFZyyoBl14qnMKIvV5qMqC/0LMcfHop45jmAE/lP3bFe
	 WeFPANWjrEO3AD1enktObNFjQ1OAr96dRWCalR6E=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/112699] Should limits.h in freestanding environment be
 self-contained?
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:35:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112699-4-pRl8OCCYBI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112699-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112699-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112699

--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1)
> Can you clarify which file you mean? gcc/ginclude does not have a limits.=
h.
>=20
> I assume you are not talking about the fixinclude'd limits.h?

No, I mean the limits.h in $(dirname $(gcc -print-libgcc-file-name)).  It
currently contains these lines to include libc limits.h:

#ifndef _LIBC_LIMITS_H_
/* Use "..." so that we find syslimits.h only in this same directory.  */
#include "syslimits.h"
#endif

(if libc limits.h is fixinclude'd, it will be saved to syslimits.h; otherwi=
se
syslimits.h will just contain "#include_next <limits.h>".)

And I'm asking if

#ifndef _LIBC_LIMITS_H_ && !__STDC_HOSTED__
/* Use "..." so that we find syslimits.h only in this same directory.  */
#include "syslimits.h"
#endif

would be better?=