From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 00ABA3858CDB; Fri,  1 Dec 2023 11:46:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 00ABA3858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1701431196;
	bh=Z94o1adIb6zTTtf5i+GCqgQX9J02eXrUc0JyTyYeW+A=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=RFNiJWfDwxrKdHevwb//WEg+VgJEbSG8dCItg6ji1hdstIOKlB98lZViiSfYhlaBU
	 swBxBBDKViKEnZy2GqS48OEjAnt/bEfOOqQ5c3FUyYYEEACZdTqEpDvecWeM8nbfC1
	 pYouE9p4xJTe61IlbLSSd+4261HA88mxuJYQOb0E=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/112740] [14 Regression] wrong code with vector
 compare on riscv64 at -O0
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 11:46:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112740-4-MBaqGps0Xs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112740-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112740-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112740

--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The only thing that's maybe suspicious is that

        machine_mode mode =3D GET_MODE (target);

but we test

        /* Use sign-extension for uniform boolean vectors with
           integer modes.  Effectively "vec_duplicate" for bitmasks.  */
        if (!TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (exp)
            && VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (type)
            && SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (mode)

where we might want to test SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE (type)) instead.
Not sure if we ever call store_constructor with target not having the same
mode as 'exp' though ...  Or we should check that mode =3D=3D TYPE_MODE (ty=
pe)
since we're moving to target anyway.=