From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 96581385AE58; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:36:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 96581385AE58
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1701383765;
	bh=9AGQnlWJw/smh6euUYcFJtx1qT9NScvJNIWbg14Zl5Q=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Oef6VwfwLr23tSwLmYl5QP1zz4OnWsdZiFFOSK5kifqZTTH0HfrWPigcmeGg7vlnd
	 Awu1vPliPz3DprB0mmcmmCbqAkS9uNy1v8CI2WB/86qk9gTCz864UdO1uDyX6xeRsY
	 ZkzqUcrZxN71IonLzsT0HRcw+JDvWDx48bhJyX4Q=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/112740] [14 Regression] wrong code with vector
 compare on riscv64 at -O0
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:35:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-112740-4-Rhpoc2XBDD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112740-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112740-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112740

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ams at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Actually it looks like r14-5319-ga5922427c29fad broke this.

This expand patch seems broken for the case in general. I am suspecting
something else is broken for GCN here ...=