From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 572C53858415; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 06:36:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 572C53858415 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1701239803; bh=4KVbRwzItWyK9NnEpiTaIoMZzyMFq8NJ49eX+rE2seY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WMK55UGLFpIZ4IvISmrpR1v6843BsAyeJSizsssNJMFLOQ7Jh24zAZrSE+F41Awvt +q0cywppPBkkaNH5lGltgzkZuBGWKtmJi2kqsofyi77lAd+e39ZrcBQ1M/j4hboq6n B+RNaUNGJmCVJzszQKSdC/kde9MwCQoSB+skBsso= From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112751] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pcrel-sibcall-1.c fails after r14-5628-g53ba8d669550d3 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 06:36:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112751 Kewen Lin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed| |2023-11-29 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > This is just a testsuite issue. The functions are currently marked as > noinline. You can either add -fno-ipa-vrp or mark them with noipa instea= d. > I am not sure if noipa here is right due to having some ipa happening due= to > localization. Thanks for looking into this, I just tested with noipa and confirmed it wor= ked well.=