From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A520938618AD; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 20:04:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A520938618AD
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1703189078;
	bh=A+5Pr+k8cEEjOUphsiIliheFK9M4Em59W/w1bhE+irQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=b9RJbfVO7nzy5ESLlD8e1SPLfL9FaBCxoGT6x/g2dcr3J74Xk14J9nmbP0UExmHa2
	 GaDXBTlbcGdmLnlhvbsuq3qkoAzJ6Cmww30GxgpSShzBdh+GSFPxHmukP2YxEtIVj0
	 DJRipnBggAIEH/ubKRi43g1rHZzAPSvwlLVFcaqU=
From: "gkm at rivosinc dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/112758] [13/14 Regression] Inconsistent
 Bitwise AND Operation Result between int and long long int
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 20:04:37 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gkm at rivosinc dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112758-4-hxL0yGEiie@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112758-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112758-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112758

--- Comment #15 from Greg McGary <gkm at rivosinc dot com> ---
I have a simple patch for this which I will submit soon. The idea is to do
nothing in expand_compound_operation() when the pattern is (sign_extend (mem
...) ).=