public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/112760] [14 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-guess-branch-probability -m8bit-idiv -mavx --param=max-cse-insns=0 and __builtin_add_overflow_p() since r14-5355 Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 12:45:19 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-112760-4-cvfToOaPJB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-112760-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112760 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- In reload dump I see no changes (except function_decl/var_decl addresses), in vzeroupper, postreload, split2, ree and cmpelim dumps a bunch of extra REG_DEAD notes here and there in r14-5355 compared to r14-5354, and finally pro_and_epilogue deletes (insn 20 19 62 2 (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (compare:CCZ (reg:SI 0 ax [110]) (reg:SI 1 dx [111]))) "pr112760.c":6:22 11 {*cmpsi_1} (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (nil))) insn. In reload dump there is: (insn 20 19 44 2 (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (compare:CCZ (reg:SI 0 ax [110]) (reg:SI 1 dx [111]))) "pr112760.c":6:22 11 {*cmpsi_1} (nil)) (insn 44 20 62 2 (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (compare:CCZ (reg:SI 0 ax [110]) (reg:SI 1 dx [111]))) "pr112760.c":6:22 11 {*cmpsi_1} (nil)) (insn 62 44 46 2 (set (reg:HI 0 ax [118]) (const_int 1 [0x1])) "pr112760.c":6:22 86 {*movhi_internal} (expr_list:REG_EQUIV (const_int 1 [0x1]) (nil))) (insn 46 62 25 2 (set (reg:HI 3 bx [orig:103 _8+2 ] [103]) (if_then_else:HI (eq (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (const_int 0 [0])) (reg:HI 3 bx [orig:103 _8+2 ] [103]) (reg:HI 0 ax [118]))) "pr112760.c":6:22 1381 {*movhicc_noc} (nil)) so the insn 20 is indeed useless and in vzeroupper pass that was correctly marked in the notes: (insn 20 19 44 2 (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (compare:CCZ (reg:SI 0 ax [110]) (reg:SI 1 dx [111]))) "pr112760.c":6:22 11 {*cmpsi_1} (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (nil))) (insn 44 20 62 2 (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (compare:CCZ (reg:SI 0 ax [110]) (reg:SI 1 dx [111]))) "pr112760.c":6:22 11 {*cmpsi_1} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 1 dx [111]) (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 0 ax [110]) (nil)))) (insn 62 44 46 2 (set (reg:HI 0 ax [118]) (const_int 1 [0x1])) "pr112760.c":6:22 86 {*movhi_internal} (expr_list:REG_EQUIV (const_int 1 [0x1]) (nil))) (insn 46 62 25 2 (set (reg:HI 3 bx [orig:103 _8+2 ] [103]) (if_then_else:HI (eq (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (const_int 0 [0])) (reg:HI 3 bx [orig:103 _8+2 ] [103]) (reg:HI 0 ax [118]))) "pr112760.c":6:22 1381 {*movhicc_noc} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:HI 0 ax [118]) (nil)))) But then postreload deletes insn 44 rather than 20 and keeps the notes around unchanged. Insn 20 is deleted in #2 0x0000000000cce9df in copyprop_hardreg_forward_1 (bb=<basic_block 0x7fffea2f7c60 (2)>, vd=0x3bd2be0) at ../../gcc/regcprop.cc:829 #3 0x0000000000ccfe1c in copyprop_hardreg_forward_bb_without_debug_insn (bb=<basic_block 0x7fffea2f7c60 (2)>) at ../../gcc/regcprop.cc:1235 #4 0x0000000000d5b371 in prepare_shrink_wrap (entry_block=<basic_block 0x7fffea2f7c60 (2)>) at ../../gcc/shrink-wrap.cc:451 #5 0x0000000000d5bb70 in try_shrink_wrapping (entry_edge=0x7fffffffd900, prologue_seq=0x7fffe9f25240) at ../../gcc/shrink-wrap.cc:674 #6 0x00000000008b4320 in thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns () at ../../gcc/function.cc:6056 and regcprop.cc documents it relies on up to date REG_DEAD/REG_UNUSED notes; after all the removal happens in /* Detect obviously dead sets (via REG_UNUSED notes) and remove them. */ if (set && !RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) && NONJUMP_INSN_P (insn) && !may_trap_p (set) && find_reg_note (insn, REG_UNUSED, SET_DEST (set)) && !side_effects_p (SET_SRC (set)) && !side_effects_p (SET_DEST (set))) { bool last = insn == BB_END (bb); delete_insn (insn); if (last) break; continue; } and regcprop.cc calls df_note_add_problem (); before calling df_analyze (). Except in the pro_and_epilogue case it is done elsewhere and it just calls into the regcprop.cc functions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-01 12:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-11-29 7:42 [Bug target/112760] New: [14 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-guess-branch-probability -m8bit-idiv -mavx --param=max-cse-insns=0 and __builtin_add_overflow_p() zsojka at seznam dot cz 2023-11-29 8:02 ` [Bug target/112760] " zsojka at seznam dot cz 2023-11-29 10:45 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/112760] " ubizjak at gmail dot com 2023-12-01 12:22 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/112760] [14 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-guess-branch-probability -m8bit-idiv -mavx --param=max-cse-insns=0 and __builtin_add_overflow_p() since r14-5355 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-01 12:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-12-01 12:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-06 8:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-06 9:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-06 18:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-112760-4-cvfToOaPJB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).