From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2F99A38582B4; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 09:50:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2F99A38582B4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704793809; bh=ejVKVqDw9AYKH5eyC/NZoDgYHO/EjVUNzfTm4xIvsA4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DEAMeK1D+JvR2UxhbA2Ydb5ixKmbh9iYGsyWROvFOFlCRLbhDxM6Gc5vnGn2Q/PxE 0dIscZgy5aegNw3cMf8JdeTYTi2Ibxe4cisxg8NAXROIjsRSAE8qjSrtecELNCuSpZ 32YpBXLyitrfjJH/yPA6NgzissVgf1mzXY68cTkE= From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/112781] [13/14 regression] internal error on function call returning extension of limited interface Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 09:50:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ada X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112781 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:275de3505e6c5b81bb8060acc5194dac8f5732b5 commit r13-8203-g275de3505e6c5b81bb8060acc5194dac8f5732b5 Author: Eric Botcazou Date: Tue Jan 9 10:46:23 2024 +0100 Fix internal error on function call returning extension of limited interface This is a regression present on the mainline and 13 branch, in the form= of a series of internal errors (3) on a function call returning the extensio= n of a limited interface. This is only a partial fix for the first two assertion failures; the th= ird one is the most problematic and will be dealt with separately. The first issue is in Instantiate_Type, where we use Base_Type in a specific case to compute the ancestor of a derived type, which will later trigger the assertion on line 16960 of sem_ch3.adb since Parent_Base and Generic_Ac= tual are the same node. This is changed to use Etype like in other cases around. The second issue is an unprotected use of Designated_Type on type T in Analyze_Explicit_Dereference, while another use in an equivalent context is guarded by Is_Access_Type a few lines above. gcc/ada PR ada/112781 * sem_ch12.adb (Instantiate_Type): Use Etype instead of Base_Ty= pe consistently to retrieve the ancestor for a derived type. * sem_ch4.adb (Analyze_Explicit_Dereference): Test Is_Access_Ty= pe consistently before accessing Designated_Type.=