From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E33D43858407; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:20:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E33D43858407
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711531257;
	bh=uojZKKn9t/xPb5rMnv+5fzZbuMG6HeaVhZxRBqO66UI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=uGoDVPAwktED7cgfqiPKOydBr2WXWUuZlD1bCFhDTmY0yxVm2uynLrV2gfTOm/m2K
	 fUDIQpnccYoWfUK6txkjzqFqifCIVAx2i9NTDLonmi3erPDzBHejLzq5IN6eKfgZMT
	 BF5BNzYtquhPWWAoapu9EgclnfxrZzYtD4Yj3Vsw=
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/112787] Codegen regression of large GCC vector
 extensions when enabling SVE
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:20:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-112787-4-A7xI7YiPzi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112787-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112787-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112787

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> They have both been backported, @Eric the tests should be passing again n=
ow.

Confirmed, thanks a lot!=