From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AAEFC3858C35; Sat, 2 Dec 2023 23:37:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AAEFC3858C35 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1701560247; bh=5lnpha1/m1vgODbCUccrUFNATlXt5HR6c5QlpiKJE5M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UC4FFwjqicpNr7z8FtjXwxemdSQQnPzNtxa3jzb7tIvFOhPwqh4L+hIDQE2B7JBTF 68lSKsutU+r8eND4l+ENVYdp2z6Z2Wvv+J+VUM8kYV0Yd1VK4F8b07YWJxAd4F5+uR n+QO3XjKITC4v1XCFnmQmdquxWwmvamUe2nAxsm4= From: "gonzalo.gadeschi at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/112789] Missing clang __builtin_ctzs for short Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2023 23:37:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gonzalo.gadeschi at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112789 --- Comment #8 from gnzlbg --- Oh! Sorry! I see this was resolved as WONTFIX. Does that mean that GCC, in contrast with the LLVM community - which is alw= ays super helpful and friendly when it comes to trying to enable their toolchai= ns to compile SW developed with GNU - intentionally does not want to enable the GNU toolchains to compile SW developed with clang?=20 If that's the case, and this is community policy, and the person who closed this as WONTFIX speaks for the entirety of the GNU community, such that no patches to fix this will be accepted, then thank you for your time consider= ing this issue and for your prompt response!=