From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A4A5B3857C65; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 17:13:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A4A5B3857C65 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1701450794; bh=ZKFO3pZ64JQHp4crJSEuuqZaDuWrYKa5a/wBFdXfpKw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vOay64ulvHz4bj41qv31lDWmPGpHCUNAGmDcX0RvFVssuMqiuPPajUwXrdYbZJl9d HQmc4zkjDUWu2KWPvXtdchfHb2//Z6KGYHUkgrIHGpaBD7X4+8VIiwrW4WGfQbqKi7 kfuo0bNWyWTM5NpCo50QFGXg694QZzsL9JUDYa1c= From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/112795] [C++>=14] ICE pragma GCC unroll (n) cxx_eval_constant_expression Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 17:13:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112795 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- Thanks for looking into this, Jakub. IIRC I didn't write this C++ support,= it was already there in Mike's original implementation.=