From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A78C33858C62; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 08:26:25 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A78C33858C62 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1701419185; bh=GQpoG9dGSBLUqptoWiCOVXVG+qs0dabNrvx3Wfqq0lw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=y6J6EeHld16MgareldnQzjhZVE36PR/fIttazbGLAS4IvTDPv14BMg9VbOnX01G/6 0O3DXgtEMaLd3GPe8Za+0crLsAw0cJVrq3W2pzmcgNmTAUUNET0v6i3jx3VsqYiwzo aMZ9tEABtOnrlLnFmAYUgc7lFGlroFmhxwhkk70c= From: "juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112801] [14] RISC-V vector: failure to mask top bits during type conversion Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 08:26:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112801 --- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > I think wrong-code should be high-priority ;) Oh. I see. Sorry. I thought it was the previous RVV shift ISA issue. since I saw c(g[1] >> 32); Confirm it is wrong code. Will take a look at it. Thanks for remind.=