From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1E08B3858CDB; Fri,  1 Dec 2023 10:38:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1E08B3858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1701427084;
	bh=tNwL4U5lgm/CeP2j36Eq2/9LxerQBAq2AfIHO0O3fJ4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Ez+VPEevGspj9D2rT8FStZsMP/hLO2HFtymfNG1KLL1IpBNAUrc+Woc3k1MMLGHBB
	 UMrSEimf4r+6TllqcdMS1TsJ1BSTOaJbxZsJdAmdTcZBERYAOpFodIIih1AoycCmYF
	 QsqIql7GCM3T9BmQv0xAQn5G+BuNLrbAm2DcwAHw=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/112806] Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) policy
 regarding explicit user optimization hint behavior
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 10:38:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc version
Message-ID: <bug-112806-4-N1TiE8tnri@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112806-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112806-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112806

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
            Version|unknown                     |14.0

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think it depends on whether the code was executed at all during training
dependent on -fprofile-partial-training which does regular profile guessing
for untrained parts of the program.

In general the situation is complicated and it's difficult to document
behavior with a short description.=