public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "zsojka at seznam dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/112807] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check (tree.h:3747) with _BitInt() at -O1 and above
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 09:56:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-112807-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112807

            Bug ID: 112807
           Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check (tree.h:3747)
                    with _BitInt() at -O1 and above
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: zsojka at seznam dot cz
                CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---
              Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
            Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Created attachment 56751
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56751&action=edit
reduced testcase

Compiler output:
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O testcase.c -wrapper valgrind,-q
==11799== Invalid read of size 2
==11799==    at 0x253EF3F: contains_struct_check (tree.h:3747)
==11799==    by 0x253EF3F: (anonymous
namespace)::bitint_large_huge::lower_addsub_overflow(tree_node*, gimple*)
(gimple-lower-bitint.cc:3951)
==11799==    by 0x2543129: (anonymous
namespace)::bitint_large_huge::lower_call(tree_node*, gimple*)
(gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5039)
==11799==    by 0x254D626: gimple_lower_bitint() (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:6386)
==11799==    by 0x13A2D3A: execute_one_pass(opt_pass*) (passes.cc:2641)
==11799==    by 0x13A361F: execute_pass_list_1(opt_pass*) (passes.cc:2750)
==11799==    by 0x13A3631: execute_pass_list_1(opt_pass*) (passes.cc:2751)
==11799==    by 0x13A3658: execute_pass_list(function*, opt_pass*)
(passes.cc:2761)
==11799==    by 0xFB0755: expand (cgraphunit.cc:1841)
==11799==    by 0xFB0755: cgraph_node::expand() (cgraphunit.cc:1794)
==11799==    by 0xFB1A9A: expand_all_functions (cgraphunit.cc:2024)
==11799==    by 0xFB1A9A: symbol_table::compile() [clone .part.0]
(cgraphunit.cc:2398)
==11799==    by 0xFB4607: compile (cgraphunit.cc:2311)
==11799==    by 0xFB4607: symbol_table::finalize_compilation_unit()
(cgraphunit.cc:2583)
==11799==    by 0x14E5F21: compile_file() (toplev.cc:473)
==11799==    by 0xDD221B: do_compile (toplev.cc:2150)
==11799==    by 0xDD221B: toplev::main(int, char**) (toplev.cc:2306)
==11799==  Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==11799== 
during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower
testcase.c: In function 'foo':
testcase.c:2:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
    2 | foo (unsigned a, _BitInt (2) b, _BitInt (256) c)
      | ^~~
0x14e5a3f crash_signal
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/toplev.cc:316
0x253ef3f contains_struct_check(tree_node*, tree_node_structure_enum, char
const*, int, char const*)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/tree.h:3747
0x253ef3f lower_addsub_overflow
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc:3951
0x2543129 lower_call
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5039
0x254d626 gimple_lower_bitint
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc:6386
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.

$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/repo/gcc-trunk/binary-latest-amd64/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/repo/gcc-trunk/binary-trunk-r14-6048-20231201170246-g6563d6767ed-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/14.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /repo/gcc-trunk//configure --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-valgrind-annotations --disable-nls --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df,extra
--disable-bootstrap --with-cloog --with-ppl --with-isl
--build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-6048-20231201170246-g6563d6767ed-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20231201 (experimental) (GCC)

             reply	other threads:[~2023-12-01  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-01  9:56 zsojka at seznam dot cz [this message]
2023-12-01 17:03 ` [Bug tree-optimization/112807] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-01 17:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-03 16:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-03 16:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-112807-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).